Loading…
Loading…
The embedded workbench keeps the map, rankings, and dossier context aligned while preserving the same explorer workflow used across place-first analysis.
Use the same layer contract as the main explorer to inspect evangelical protestant across states, counties, metros, and media markets without leaving the dossier.
| Rank | Place | Value | Pres. context |
|---|
Use the dossier’s strongest places and modeled geography context as a starting point for a deeper analysis.
| Geography | % Population | % Adherents | Population x U.S. | Adherents x U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania | 9.8% | 20.9% | 0.60x U.S. | 0.62x U.S. |
| California | 9.1% | 20.1% | 0.55x U.S. | 0.59x U.S. |
| Hawaii | 8.9% | 22.0% | 0.55x U.S. | 0.65x U.S. |
| Delaware | 8.8% | 22.0% | 0.54x U.S. | 0.65x U.S. |
| Vermont | 7.2% | 19.3% | 0.44x U.S. | 0.57x U.S. |
| Connecticut | 6.9% | 14.6% | 0.42x U.S. | 0.43x U.S. |
| Nevada | 6.6% | 16.3% | 0.40x U.S. | 0.48x U.S. |
| Maine | 6.0% | 19.8% | 0.37x U.S. | 0.58x U.S. |
| New York | 5.2% | 10.1% | 0.32x U.S. | 0.30x U.S. |
| New Jersey | 5.1% | 9.8% | 0.31x U.S. | 0.29x U.S. |
| Geography | % Population | % Adherents | Population x U.S. | Adherents x U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia, PA | 10.0% | 26.0% | 0.61x U.S. | 0.77x U.S. |
| Douglas, WA | 10.0% | 35.2% | 0.61x U.S. | 1.04x U.S. |
| Lincoln, SD | 9.9% | 38.3% | 0.61x U.S. | 1.13x U.S. |
| Morrison, MN | 9.9% | 16.4% | 0.61x U.S. | 0.48x U.S. |
| Portage, OH | 9.9% | 35.1% | 0.61x U.S. | 1.03x U.S. |
| Gloucester, NJ | 9.9% | 16.7% | 0.61x U.S. | 0.49x U.S. |
| Cumberland, NJ | 9.9% | 22.6% | 0.61x U.S. | 0.67x U.S. |
| El Paso, TX | 9.9% | 15.9% | 0.61x U.S. | 0.47x U.S. |
| Cape May, NJ | 9.9% | 15.1% | 0.60x U.S. | 0.44x U.S. |
| Scott, IA | 9.9% | 25.0% | 0.60x U.S. | 0.74x U.S. |
| Williams, ND | 9.9% | 25.9% | 0.60x U.S. | 0.76x U.S. |
| Hancock, MS | 9.8% | 34.0% | 0.60x U.S. | 1.00x U.S. |
| Kauai, HI | 9.8% | 20.9% | 0.60x U.S. | 0.62x U.S. |
| Stark, IL | 9.8% | 30.9% | 0.60x U.S. | 0.91x U.S. |
| Crawford, GA | 9.8% | 55.9% | 0.60x U.S. | 1.65x U.S. |
| Braxton, WV | 9.8% | 22.3% | 0.60x U.S. | 0.66x U.S. |
| Jackson, WI | 9.8% | 28.4% | 0.60x U.S. | 0.84x U.S. |
| Dona Ana, NM | 9.8% | 26.2% | 0.60x U.S. | 0.77x U.S. |
| Lucas, IA | 9.8% | 33.0% | 0.60x U.S. | 0.97x U.S. |
| Traill, ND | 9.8% | 16.7% | 0.60x U.S. | 0.49x U.S. |
| Washington, PA | 9.8% | 23.2% | 0.60x U.S. | 0.68x U.S. |
| Edwards, KS | 9.8% | 17.2% | 0.60x U.S. | 0.51x U.S. |
| Isabella, MI | 9.8% | 30.0% | 0.60x U.S. | 0.88x U.S. |
| Columbia, OR | 9.8% | 40.8% | 0.60x U.S. | 1.20x U.S. |
| Okanogan, WA | 9.8% | 27.9% | 0.60x U.S. | 0.82x U.S. |
| Geography | % Population | % Adherents | Population x U.S. | Adherents x U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| El Paso (Las Cruces) | 9.8% | 17.3% | 0.60x U.S. | 0.51x U.S. |
| Los Angeles | 9.7% | 19.6% | 0.59x U.S. | 0.58x U.S. |
| Davenport-R.Island-Moline | 9.6% | 24.4% | 0.59x U.S. | 0.72x U.S. |
| Pittsburgh | 9.6% | 18.1% | 0.59x U.S. | 0.53x U.S. |
| Madison | 9.5% | 24.6% | 0.58x U.S. | 0.73x U.S. |
| San Diego | 9.5% | 22.8% | 0.58x U.S. | 0.67x U.S. |
| Detroit | 9.3% | 21.6% | 0.57x U.S. | 0.64x U.S. |
| Butte-Bozeman | 9.2% | 29.1% | 0.56x U.S. | 0.86x U.S. |
| Honolulu | 8.9% | 22.0% | 0.55x U.S. | 0.65x U.S. |
| Marquette | 8.7% | 20.3% | 0.54x U.S. | 0.60x U.S. |
| Duluth-Superior | 8.7% | 23.7% | 0.53x U.S. | 0.70x U.S. |
| Cedar Rapids-Wtrlo-IWC&Dub | 8.6% | 18.6% | 0.53x U.S. | 0.55x U.S. |
| Chicago | 8.4% | 16.0% | 0.52x U.S. | 0.47x U.S. |
| Binghamton | 8.0% | 19.8% | 0.49x U.S. | 0.58x U.S. |
| Wilkes Barre-Scranton-Hztn | 8.0% | 17.5% | 0.49x U.S. | 0.52x U.S. |
50+ ranked geographies
Unlock searchable state, county, metro, and DMA rankings for this group.
Unlock with Pro$33/mo| County | Footprint | 2024 actual | Modeled | Residual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claiborne, MS | 8.2%adherents 62.8% | D+67.5 | R+35.5 | D+103.0 |
| Orleans, LA | 8.6%adherents 15.4% | D+67.0 | R+35.5 | D+102.5 |
| Jefferson, MS | 9.5%adherents 25.6% | D+66.3 | R+35.5 | D+101.8 |
| Greene, AL | 9.2%adherents 33.2% | D+55.7 | R+35.5 | D+91.2 |
| Montgomery, MD | 8.7%adherents 16.3% | D+52.8 | R+35.5 | D+88.3 |
| Tompkins, NY | 8.6%adherents 28.7% | D+50.0 | R+35.5 | D+85.5 |
| Washtenaw, MI | 8.1%adherents 25.4% | D+44.4 | R+35.5 | D+79.9 |
| Santa Clara, CA | 8.5%adherents 18.6% | D+40.0 | R+35.5 | D+75.4 |
| Douglas, KS | 8.5%adherents 29.3% | D+37.6 | R+35.5 | D+73.1 |
| Hancock, GA | 8.6%adherents 27.4% | D+35.4 | R+35.5 | D+70.9 |
| Los Angeles, CA | 8.6%adherents 16.9% | D+32.9 | R+35.5 | D+68.4 |
| New Castle, DE | 8.0%adherents 17.0% | D+32.6 | R+35.5 | D+68.0 |
Unlock the full election-year table, method labels, and model metadata.
Unlock with Pro$33/mo